Integrated Universes

Using this theory I am trying to induce a similarity between two accepted systems existing around us. Although this theory attempts to give a new direction to our thoughts about our universe, it also gives birth to questions many of which are unanswered.

We are all composed of matter and energy. The nuclear system is vastly accepted. Various scientists have proved that matter consists of atoms and molecules with similar contents – electrons, protons, neutrons, quarks, etc. An electron is supposed to revolve around the nucleus. The nucleus has a positive charge and the electrons are negative with respect to it. The orbit of an electron is elliptical and due to high energies, it also rotates about itself. The electrons are held together to the atom’s nucleus due to nuclear energy. There are lots of electrons in an atom. Many atoms and molecules make up matter. Also, electrons can ‘hop’ from one atom to another. This flow of electrons is called electricity by us. Also an atom can disintegrate itself into two or more atoms or some atoms can combine to form a new element. These processes are commonly referred to as nuclear fission and fusion.

But there is another institution where these facts seem to repeat. This is a planetary system. Planets revolve and rotate around their stars. This happens similar to electrons. The orbit too is elliptical. The planets are held to their stars due to gravitational energy. Many planets revolve around one star. And many such planetary systems make up our universe. The flow of electricity is similar to comets. Planets can leave their stars, if they feel a stronger gravitational field elsewhere. On the other hand, a moving comet may be roped in by the gravitational energy of a star. Radioactivity is vaguely similar to formation of stars.

Of course the time factor must be taken into consideration. Compared to a planet, an electron revolves at a very high speed. But, if we calculate the time periods of the other comparisons, we’ll find that they are relative. There are also some areas near atoms which are deficient or rich in matter or energy i.e. concentration of energy & matter. In planetary systems, black holes are similar to these areas. Just like extra-nuclear particles, we too have asteroids. One can find many such similarities between the nuclear and planetary systems. It is quite logical to assume that the electrons may well be composed of finer particles that cannot be detected by even electron microscopes. Similarly, our universe may too be just a small part of another such system. Thus the number of ‘integrated universes’ can be many as there can be integration within another.

This freaky theory gives birth to other questions. Can there be life on other such systems? Is our solar system just a Fluorine atom with Earth as its third electron? What is the possibility to find life on the third electron of a Fluorine atom?

More to come on the same topic. (I’m still thinkig from different angles.)

Thank you for reading this post. Your comments, pingbacks, ratings, reviews and any other contributions are greatly appreciated.