Many among us have heard of Technological singularity. It’s been a prominent element in many books as well as movies. Theoretically, at the speed with which we are creating machines, this concept looks possible in the very near future. So, what’s really freaky about it? Read on…
In thousands of years of civilization, man has been able to invent and build several machines. Starting from the simple wheel to the complex humanoids of today, we have been able to build machines that are stronger, faster, tougher and some of them even more intelligent than man. But there is always a threat that these machines will become too smart and overpower us. Thus men will become slaves or be killed leading to the end of mankind.
But there is another case to it. The robots that we have made, machines, automobiles and all other contraptions are our discoveries. We have made only what we have seen, heard, smelt, tasted, touched or felt. Only our experience has helped us in making these things.
For eg. Man thought and created a flying machine only because we’ve been seeing birds flying from several years. If there were no flying beasts, we’d never thought of creating an airplane!
And in the pursuit of ‘advancement of technology’, we have ended up creating robots. We have induced a great similarity in our systems and robotic systems. Humanoids now look like us, talk like us, and in a few years will alos be able to feel and emote like us. Then, in a few years we’ll have robots which can replicate themselves. Thus robots will be able to do everything that humans can do, and sometimes in a better way. So, it is obvious that some of us fear the very machines that we build. There’s nothing wrong to it.
But a very interesting proposition occurs to me. I’ll like to illustrate it with an example. Imagine that we have created machines that are capable of doing a lot more than we are. And then, there’s a great war. We are all wiped out and only the machines remain! So, what happens then?
The machines will keep on advancing and some day might create other beings or artificial machines! Or maybe these machines were what really evolved on Earth and we are the artificial beings created by them. After all we don’t have real proof about our evolution, just theories?
So, can this be really possible. Why not? There have been many evidences in the past of great wars fought. It is human tendency to not let anyone rule us.
This does raise many more questions
Where do we come from? What are our motives of existence?
Did other intelligent species really exist? What were they like?
And in the process of becoming the ‘ultimate on this planet’, have we ended up destroying our creators?
If we were created by some beings, it’s safe to presume that they made us replicas of their own kind.
But, won’t It be really absurd if we find that our inventors were none other than machines itself !!!
Filed under: Freaky Theories, My Universes, Space Time
Kepler (demolish)Vs Einstein’s space jail of time
r ————– Exp (i wt) ———–S= r Exp (ì wt) Nahhas’ Equation
Orbit location———–Orbit light sensing ————– Visual orbit location
Particle/Newton —————- –Visual ————————– Wave/Quantum
Quantum – Newton=visual effects=relativistic effects=space-time confusions
S= visual distance; r = actual distance; v = speed and c = light speed
S = r Exp (i wt) = r [cosine (wt) + î sine (wt)]
P =d S/d t = v Exp (ì w t) + ì r w Exp (ì w t); v=d r/d t; v=w r
= v (1+ ì) [Exp (ì wt)] = visual velocity
E (definition) = m/2(m v + m’ r) ²; E = mc²/2 If v = 0; m’ r=mc
E (visual) = mp²/2 = mv²/2(1+ì) ² Exp 2(ì w t)
E (visual) = mv²/2(1 + 2ì -1) [cos2wt + ì sin2wt]
E (visual) = ì (mv²) [1-2sin²wt + 2i [sin (wt)] [cosine (wt)]
If wt = (2n+1) π/4
E (visual) = ì (mv²) [1-1 ± ỉ] = ± (mc²); v = c
2-Central force law Areal velocity is constant: r² (d θ/d t) =h Kepler’s Law
h = 2π a b/T; b=a√ (1-ε²); a = mean distance value; ε = eccentricity
r² (d θ/d t) = h = S² (d w/d t)
Replace r with S = r exp (ỉ wt); h = [r² Exp (2iwt)] (d w/d t)
(d w/d t) = (h/r²) exp [-2(i wt)]
d w/d t= (h/r²) [cosine 2(wt) - ỉ sine 2(wt)] = (h/r²) [1- 2sine² (wt) - ỉ sin 2(wt)]
d w/d t = d w(x)/d t + d w(y)/d t; d w(x)/d t = (h/r²) [ 1- 2sine² (wt)]
d w(x)/d t – (h/r²) = – 2(h/r²)sine²(wt) = – 2(h/r²)(v/c)² v/c=sine wt
(h/ r²)(Perihelion/Periastron)= [2πa.a√ (1-ε²)]/Ta² (1-ε) ²= [2π√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²
Δ w/d t = (d w/d t – h/r²] = -4π {[√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²} (v/c) ² radian per second
Δ w/d t = (- 4π /T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} (v/c) ² radians
Δ w°/d t = (-720/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} (v/c) ² degrees; Multiplication by 180/π
Δ w°/d t = (-720×36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/(1-ε)²} (v/c)² degrees/100 years
Δ w”/d t = (-720×3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/(1-ε) ²} (v/c) ² seconds of arc multiplication by 3600
Δ w/d t = (-720×36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²]/(1-ε)²} (v/c)² seconds of arc per century
The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 – ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²- –.) ≈ 2πa (1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4) v=√ [G m M / (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] ≈ √ [GM/a (1-ε²/4)]; m<>Exp (ì w t) ———->> S=r Exp (ì wt) Nahhas’ Equation
Orbit——–>> Orbit light sensing——>> Visual Orbit; Exp = Exponential
Particle —->> light sensing of moving objects———— >> Wave
Newton———>>light sensing———->> Quantum
Quantum = Newton x Visual Effects
Quantum – Newton = Relativistic = Optical Illusions
E (Energy by definition) = mv²/2 = mc²/2; if v = c
m = mass; v= speed; c= light speed; w= angular velocity; t= time
S = r Exp (ì w t) = r [cos (wt) + ì sin (wt)] Visual effects
P = visual velocity = change of visual location
P = d S/d t = v Exp (ì w t) + ì w r Exp (ì w t)
= (v + ì w r) Exp (ì w t) = v (1 + ì) Exp (ì w t) = visual speed; v = wr
E (visual energy= what you see in lab) = m p²/2; replace v by p in E = mv²/2
= m p²/2 = m v²/2 (1 + ì) ² Exp (2ì wt)
= mv²/2 (2ì) [cosine (2wt) + ì sine (2wt)]
=ì mv² [1 - 2 sine² (wt) + 2 ì sine (wt) cosine (wt)];v = speed; c = light speed
wt = π/2
E (visual) = ìmv² (1 – 2 + 0)
E (visual) = -ì mc² ≡ mc² (absolute value;-ì = negative complex unit) If v = c
w t = π/4
E (visual) = imv² [1-1 +ỉ] =-mc²; v = c
wt =-π/4+ỉln2/2; 2ỉ wt=-ỉπ/2 – ln2
Exp (2i wt) = Exp [-ỉπ/2] Exp [ln(1/2)]=[-ỉ (1/2)]
E (visual) = imv² (-ỉ/2) =1/2mc² v = c
Conclusion: E = mc² is the visual Illusion of E = mc²/2 joenahhas1958@yahoo.com. All rights reserved.
PS: In case of E=mc² claims to be rest energy claims then
E=1/2m (m v + m’ r) ² = (1/2m) (m’ r) ²; v = 0
E = (1/2m) (mc) ²; m’ r =mc
E=mc²/2
Kepler (demolish)Vs Einstein’s space jail of time
r ————– Exp (i wt) ———–S= r Exp (ì wt) Nahhas’ Equation
Orbit location———–Orbit light sensing ————– Visual orbit location
Particle/Newton —————- –Visual ————————– Wave/Quantum
Quantum – Newton=visual effects=relativistic effects=space-time confusions
S= visual distance; r = actual distance; v = speed and c = light speed
S = r Exp (i wt) = r [cosine (wt) + î sine (wt)]
P =d S/d t = v Exp (ì w t) + ì r w Exp (ì w t); v=d r/d t; v=w r
= v (1+ ì) [Exp (ì wt)] = visual velocity
E (definition) = m/2(m v + m’ r) ²; E = mc²/2 If v = 0; m’ r=mc
E (visual) = mp²/2 = mv²/2(1+ì) ² Exp 2(ì w t)
E (visual) = mv²/2(1 + 2ì -1) [cos2wt + ì sin2wt]
E (visual) = ì (mv²) [1-2sin²wt + 2i [sin (wt)] [cosine (wt)]
If wt = (2n+1) π/4
E (visual) = ì (mv²) [1-1 ± ỉ] = ± (mc²); v = c
2-Central force law Areal velocity is constant: r² (d θ/d t) =h Kepler’s Law
h = 2π a b/T; b=a√ (1-ε²); a = mean distance value; ε = eccentricity
r² (d θ/d t) = h = S² (d w/d t)
Replace r with S = r exp (ỉ wt); h = [r² Exp (2iwt)] (d w/d t)
(d w/d t) = (h/r²) exp [-2(i wt)]
d w/d t= (h/r²) [cosine 2(wt) - ỉ sine 2(wt)] = (h/r²) [1- 2sine² (wt) - ỉ sin 2(wt)]
d w/d t = d w(x)/d t + d w(y)/d t; d w(x)/d t = (h/r²) [ 1- 2sine² (wt)]
d w(x)/d t – (h/r²) = – 2(h/r²)sine²(wt) = – 2(h/r²)(v/c)² v/c=sine wt
(h/ r²)(Perihelion/Periastron)= [2πa.a√ (1-ε²)]/Ta² (1-ε) ²= [2π√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²
Δ w/d t = (d w/d t – h/r²] = -4π {[√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²} (v/c) ² radian per second
Δ w/d t = (- 4π /T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} (v/c) ² radians
Δ w°/d t = (-720/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} (v/c) ² degrees; Multiplication by 180/π
Δ w°/d t = (-720×36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/(1-ε)²} (v/c)² degrees/100 years
Δ w”/d t = (-720×3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/(1-ε) ²} (v/c) ² seconds of arc multiplication by 3600
Δ w/d t = (-720×36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²]/(1-ε)²} (v/c)² seconds of arc per century
The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 – ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²- –.) ≈ 2πa (1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4) v=√ [G m M / (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] ≈ √ [GM/a (1-ε²/4)]; m<<M; Solar system
Application 3: Advance of Perihelion of mercury.
G=6.673×10^-11; M=2×10^30kg; m=.32×10^24kg
ε = 0.206; T=88days; c = 299792.458 km/sec; a = 58.2km/sec
Calculations yields:
v =48.14km/sec
[√ (1- ε²)] (1-ε) ² = 1.552
Δ w”= (-720×36526x3600/88) x (1.552) (48.14/299792)²=43.0”/century
Conclusions:
E ≠ mc² (special-relativity) and the 43" seconds of arc of advance of perihelion of Planet mercury (general-relativity) is are caused by deformed space-time physicists "thought" and not deformed space (x, y, z).
Anyone dare to prove me wrong?
E=mc²/2
E (Energy by definition) = mv²/2 = mc²/2; if v = c
m = mass; v= speed; c= light speed; w= angular velocity; t= time
S = r Exp (ì w t) = r [cos (wt) + ì sin (wt)] Visual effects
P = visual velocity = change of visual location
P = d S/d t = v Exp (ì w t) + ì w r Exp (ì w t)
= (v + ì w r) Exp (ì w t) = v (1 + ì) Exp (ì w t) = visual speed; v = w r
E (visual energy= what you see in lab) = m p²/2; replace v by p in E = mv²/2
= m p²/2 = m v²/2 (1 + ì) ² Exp (2ì wt)
= mv²/2 (2ì) [cosine (2wt) + ì sine (2wt)]
=ì mv² [1 - 2 sine² (wt) + 2 ì sine (wt) cosine (wt)];v = speed; c = light speed
wt = π/2
E (visual) = ìmv² (1 – 2 + 0)
E (visual) = -ì mc² ≡ mc² (absolute value;-ì = negative complex unit) If v = c
w t = π/4
E (visual) = imv² [1-1 +ỉ] =-mc²; v = c
wt =-π/4+ỉln2/2; 2ỉ wt=-ỉπ/2 – ln2
Exp (2i wt) = Exp [-ỉπ/2] Exp [ln(1/2)]=[-ỉ (1/2)]
E (visual) = imv² (-ỉ/2) =1/2mc² v = c
Conclusion: E = mc² is the visual Illusion of E = mc²/2 joenahhas1958@yahoo.com. All rights reserved.
PS: In case of E=mc² claims to be rest energy claims then
E=1/2m (m v + m’ r) ² = (1/2m) (m’ r) ²; v = 0
E = (1/2m) (mc) ²; m’ r =mc
E=mc²/2
Fully agree with you, about a week ago wrote about the same in his blog!
super post